Communications and Networking Conference †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Communications and Networking Conference. Answer: Introduction: The encryption key management is considered as the administration of the tasks which is for the protection, storing and then backing up all the encryption keys. There are different high-profile data losses and the regulatory standards which leads to the increase in the use of the encryption. With this, the useof the encryption tools are set with the secured storage, protection and the retrieval. There are different forms of the measures which include the Key Management Interoperability Protocol which has been developed by the vendors and then submitted for the Structured Information Standards. The management type for the encryption keys are set to convert the data into the streams with the symmetric key algorithms that make use of the single key to secure the authentication and achieve the confidentiality and authentication. The encryption and the storage with the backup is important for protection from the loss, corruption and any unauthorised form of the access (Rath et al., 2016). The processes could be used for the controlling keys with the easy management that includes the keys with the easy management of how the different keys are assigned for the evaluation. PKMv2 is also for handling the encryption of the data with the management of the keys, and the key recovery procedures which are set in place. It will be able to take hold of the central key repository with a proper protection standard. EAP: The protocol is for the authentication framework which is mainly used in the wireless networks and to handle the point-to-point connections. They are for the authentication based on the transport and handling the usage of the key material and parameters. The EAP is one of the best formwork for the data security standards which includes the functions and the negotiation of the authentication methods. There are different packets which are for the Lightweight EAP that is used with the IEEE ratification in 802.11 security standards. The forms include the detailed analysis with the use of one-time password which can generate the authentication keys. The EAP method is also for the two-factor user authentication where the user needs the physical access to the token and the knowledge with the personal identification number (Alavi et al., 2016). The protected communication channels with the mutual authentication is for the parties to communicate and has been designed for the authenticati on over the insecure networks. The documentation is related to the RFC where the schemes are based on providing the resistance to the active attack, passive and dictionary attack. EAS: The Advanced Encryption Standards are mainly defined with the use of the designing principles and the substitution. The combination is based on the substitution and the permutation framework. It works on the security standards with the key space that increased by the factor of and how the additional bit of the key length can handle the brute force search which increase with the key length. The measures are taken to analyse the side channel attacks which do not tend to work with the cipher as the black box (Zhou et al.,2016). The attack implementations on the hardware or the software systems tend to leak the data with the major focus on the different AES forms. The AES is also for the encryption with the symmetric block cipher which could be for the protection of the information and then working over the implementation in the software and the hardware through the world to handle the data encryption. The security, cost and implementation are some of the important features which ar e set to handle the designing with 128-bit blocks to make use of the key sized at 128,192 and 256 bits. The costs are related to the standards that include the hardware or the software. AES works on the different transformation which includes the data stored in the array. This is also then put for cipher to handle the transformation over the number of the encryption rounds. The security issues of the Bluetooth attacks against the confidentiality, data integrity and the availability. There are configurations which are based on the theft and the loss, eavesdropping and the impersonation. The default configuration is the major security issue, where the information can be used for the impersonation, or the location correlation mainly for the profiling. The Bluetooth enabled devices to have the minimised security level with the security mode 1 that has been set by default (Ba et al, 2017). There is other default configuration of the devices which intend to make up the initial use and the setup of the devices. The theft and the loss for the electronic computing of the devices is based on the advancement of the technology. The impersonation and the eavesdropping are some of the issues which needs to be taken care for the proper communication. Here, the devices also allow the individual to intercept or listen on the communication mainly in between the two parti es (Huang et al., 2016). The frequency of the hopping algorithm could easily be circumvented using the Bluetooth listening device which are set through the vendors as devices for mainly diagnosing the different issues of the Bluetooth communication. The person-in-the-middle attack is mainly the attack that leverage the vulnerabilities in the baseband specifications. The Bluetooth devices can easily intercept with the communication and the attacker tends to impersonate the victim devices. The service mapping and the access using Bluetooth technology is mainly used for encryption the attack is mainly to determine the valuable information with the attacker determining the attack on the system. The visualisation of the corporate site is when the LAP (LAN Access Points) are strategically deployed with the profiling based on the Bluetooth specifications and connection to the LAN infrastructure. The other example which is used is ZigBee where the security challenges are mainly to find the encryption key by the snapping. The wireless attacks are mainly the attacks which fall under the physical, key and the replay or injection attacks. The physical attacks are mainly the ones which includes the ZigBee radio with the focus on ability to interact physically with the device to obtain the encryption key that is used for the target of the network. With this, there are other issues related to the attackers who can utilise the serial interfaces with capturing the encryption keys based on low cost and open source tools (Fourmeau et al., 2017). The key attacks are mainly for the utilisation of the encryption with the pre-shared keying and Over the Air key delivery. The security includes the intrusion detection capabilities which works with the support of low-cost ZigBee radios. The attacker who is using the hardware and the software based tools has the capability to perform any of the illicit actions with the connection of the devices to perform the attack. The replay and the injection attacks could be for the packet replay (Das et al., 2016). With this, the issues are mainly susceptible with the lightweight designing of the protocol. Along with this, the malicious user tends to make use of the radio to collect the packets which are being transmitted from the network of ZigBee. Through this, one is also not able to decode the packets as per the requirement. The network mimicking or the origination of the nodes is also not possible due to the minimal session check which is performed by the ZigBee radios. According to Shaikh et al., (2016)., the wireless sensor has been mainly set with the pervasive and thee wide deployment of the IoT. The systems are set with the limited energy associated that is the major bottleneck of the technologies. The discussion is about the maximisation of the energy which is harvested in WSNs with the identification of the cost effective, efficient and the reliable energy harvesting systems (Benaatou et al., 2017). It includes the motivation for the energy harvesting with the detailed focus on the static sensor nodes that have the lower power of processing and the limited capabilities of the power as well. For this, the deployment is mainly in the ad-hoc manner which tends to cooperate to form the wireless sensor network. The sensing subsystems are mainly to acquire the data and the processing which is for handling the data in the local form. The wireless communication with the battery and the limited energy budget can take hold of the power with the use of the sensor for the sub-systems. The forms re set with the minimisation of the communication cost, where the approach is mainly to make use of the network processing, data prediction and then sending the data as per the requirement. The mobility in WSN can also help in reducing the energy consumption which incurs with the lower overheads. The mobility expends with more energy with motors and the other hardware working with more energy. The ra dio frequency based energy harvesting is mainly based on the sensor nodes which can easily be used for the two radios with RF and the other for the communication with the sensor nodes. The optimisation of the solution is set with the RFID tags that could easily be viewed with harvesting solutions that are in the market. The RFID reader is also able to send the signals to query the tags with the response with identification by powering from the inductance of the loop. It also includes the identification of the techniques that needs to be leveraged with the ambient environment and the external sources which is mainly to generate the energy for the WSNs. For the protocol adaptation, the focus is on how the energy efficiency with the network protocol could be maximised with lifetime network setup. According to Ulukus, Sennur, et al. (2015)., the focus of the paper is mainly on handling the broad areas for the energy harvesting wireless communications. The different standards are based on how the energy harvesting wireless networks can develop the new medical and the better environment surveillance which is impossible, otherwise. With this, there are other associated with the solar, indoor lighting with the energy harvested from the man-made sources using the wireless technologies. The forms are set with the schemes with dimensions to the wireless communication in the form of the intermittence and the randomness of the available energy. The paper is also about the consideration for the throughput maximisation with working over the energy harvests. The focus is also on considering the online energy management for the throughput maximisation. It includes the section that works with the single user channels and the transmitter has the queues names of the data queue and the energy queue when the arrival of the data packets is scheduled depending upon the use of the energy in the battery. The article is about focusing over the standards of the broad area of energy with the ranges set from the information theoretic physical layer performance with scheduling the policies and the medium access to control the performance of the protocols. The consideration is about working over the physical properties with the storage imperfections, consumption models and the other processing costs which are important for working over the energy harvesting profiles. The area of the energy is mainly to take hold of the device and the circuit technologies with the connections to the different layers of the network designing. The future challenges for the signal processing and the communications are for the different networking layers where the advancement is from the circuits and the devices that tend to harvest and handle the transfer of energy. References Alavi, M. A., Fernando, W. P. U., Permuna, P. A. Y. P., Jayathilake, K. D. K. C., Mathurusha, S., Vithanage, N. S., Dhammearatchi, D. (2016). Enhanced QoS support in OFDMA-Based WiMAX Systems.Compusoft,5(4), 2090. Ba, P. N., Ouya, S., Farssi, S. M., Maiga, A., Raimy, A., Rodrigues, J. J. (2017, May). Modeling of a LTE and WIMAX mobile networks SINR-based heterogeneous system-the case of the Virtual University of Senegal. InCommunications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2017 IEEE International Conference on(pp. 1293-1298). IEEE. Benaatou, W., Latif, A., Pla, V., Baba, M. D. (2017, June). Handover based on a multi criteria approach in WiMax networks. InWireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), 2017 13th International(pp. 1974-1979). IEEE. Das, S., Sen, S. (2016). ANALYSIS OF WIRELESS NETWORK THROUGH WIMAX IN QUALNET. Fourneau, J. M., Mokdad, L., Othman, J. B., Abdelli, A. (2017, March). Admission Control Based on WRR in WiMAX Networks. InWireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2017 IEEE(pp. 1-6). IEEE. Huang, J., Huang, C. T. (2016). Design and Verification of Secure Mutual Authentication Protocols for Mobile Multihop Relay WiMAX Networks against Rogue Base/Relay Stations.Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering,2016. Rath, H. K., Karandikar, A., Sharma, V. (2016). TCP-aware Cross Layer Scheduling with Adaptive Modulation in IEEE 802.16 (WiMAX) Networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.02732. Zhou, J., Ma, M., Feng, Y., Nguyen, T. N. (2016). A symmetric key-based pre-authentication protocol for secure handover in mobile WiMAX networks.The Journal of Supercomputing,72(7), 2734-2751.